Chapter 6: Conclusions & Bibliography ~ Irish Investment In China. Setting New Patterns

No comments yet

IrishAsia2Introduction
Based on research undertaken on Irish outward FDI into the US and UK, both of which are developed economies, Barry et al conclude that Irish FDI is disproportionately horizontal and oriented towards non-internationally traded sectors. As China is now the largest global recipient of inward FDI, and is a developing economy, research was undertaken among all Irish MNEs which have invested in China to ascertain if current Irish FDI into China conforms to the model identified in the case of Irish FDI into the US and UK.  Accepting that the level of Irish FDI in China is at a relatively low level, the value in considering this hypothesis is that Irish FDI in China will presumably increase, given China’s pre-eminent role in inward FDI.
While there are several investment theories, Dunning’s eclectic paradigm was chosen as the optimal framework within which to conduct this research, as it facilitates simultaneous analysis of the advantages enjoyed by both the MNE and the host economy.
Desk-based research and semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the nature of Irish FDI in China. The decision to use semi-structured interviews to obtain data on the perceptions of executives can be considered appropriate, as the executives provided rich data on the rationale underlying the investment decision and the locational advantages and disadvantages which China poses.
Executives of non-Irish MNEs which have invested in China were interviewed in addition. The inclusion of non-Irish MNEs provided an opportunity to corroborate the views of executives of Irish MNEs and provided a broader pool of expertise from which to gather perceptions on the locational advantages and disadvantages which China poses for investors. Executives from Irish MNEs which have invested in Eastern Europe were interviewed separately to gain an understanding of why the level of Irish FDI into China is relatively low.

Main Findings
Barry et al (2003) analysed the nature of Irish outward FDI and observed an increasing level of Irish outward FDI. The main destination for this FDI is developed economies, particularly the US and the UK. It is suggested that Barry et al made a significant contribution to the research into Irish outward FDI by their identification of Irish outward FDI as being disproportionately horizontal and oriented towards non-internationally traded sectors. This research builds on their model and extends the knowledge of Irish outward FDI by examining the nature and scope of Irish FDI into China, a developing economy. The value in studying FDI in China lies primarily in its status as the principal recipient of inward FDI globally. Since the introduction of the ‘opening-up’ policy in 1979, economic reforms in China have created an increasingly favourable climate for inward FDI. However, considerable challenges still remain with inadequate legal protection and challenges to intellectual property rights.
But Beijing’s desire to expand the service and private sectors, combined with its willingness to allow foreign firms to compete nearly across the board, means that the China market is now becoming a real opportunity just as the purchasing power of Chinese consumers is beginning to increase. And China is likely to remain the world’s fastest growing major economy for the coming decade and beyond …Understanding how to do well in China and with Chinese resources will become a critical component in a global competitive strategy. (Lieberthal and Lieberthal, 2004: 11)

In order to deepen our understanding of the nature of Irish FDI and specifically the nature of Irish FDI in the largest global recipient of inward FDI, this research has examined the hypothesis that the nature of Irish outward FDI, as identified by Barry et al, varies in the case of China. This research has contributed to our understanding of Ireland’s investment development path by introducing a study of Irish outward FDI in a developing economy for the first time.

The research was undertaken among all Irish MNEs that have invested in China. The aim was to identify initial trends and patterns, while relating this to the existing, albeit scant, literature on Irish outward FDI. While accepting that this is a small sample size, the results of this research indicate that Irish FDI in China is predominately in the traded sector (82%) and is marginally horizontal (55%) as opposed to vertical (45%) in nature. This represents a deviation from Barry et al’s earlier findings in the case of Irish FDI in developed economies, namely the US and UK. It can be said, therefore, that current Irish FDI into China is chiefly in the traded sector and marginally horizontal, and that Barry et al’s model does not apply to the current wave of Irish FDI in China. In addition, the sectoral composition of FDI in China varies from that in the US, as identified by Barry et al. IT, electronics and telecoms have a higher proportion of investment in China than in the US. However, FDI in financial services and construction is at a lower level in China.
The question has to be asked why Irish FDI in China deviates from that in the traditional destinations for Irish FDI. This research found that perhaps the most significant locational disadvantage which China poses is the challenge to the preservation of intellectual property rights. Barry et al point to the strong growth in outward FDI in Irish IT and pharmaceutical industries. However, the potential risk of IPR violation may be restricting FDI in China in these sectors.
This view is supported by research undertaken among executives of Irish MNEs which have invested in Eastern Europe. Another possible explanation for the relatively low levels of Irish FDI in China is the relatively under-developed nature of the service sector in China, which is particularly strong in the Irish economy. Given the large manufacturing base of the Chinese economy, it is possible that investors in Irish manufacturing sectors are in the first wave of Irish FDI in China. They may be followed by MNEs from the service sector, as this sector gathers pace in China.

Structural changes are occurring in the Chinese economy, with a reduction in manufacturing and increases in construction, utilities and the service sector. The shift in the composition of industry should be of benefit to potential Irish investors, given the largely non-traded element of Irish outward FDI in developed economies. It can be speculated that as the importance of the nontraded sector increases in China, more Irish MNEs may invest. This could alter the composition of Irish FDI in China, increase the non-traded component, and move Irish FDI in China closer to Barry et al’s model.
In order to deepen our knowledge of Irish investment into China, this research also examined a sub-hypothesis and, on this basis, advanced some prescriptions regarding the role of public policy. It is hypothesised that the business environment in China is different from that experienced by Irish investors in more traditional destinations for Irish outward FDI. On the basis of this, an additional argument was made that consideration should be given to ameliorating these market distortions through public policy.

Before summarising the findings of this research in relation to locational disadvantages, it is important to identify the locational advantages which China offers investors. The principal locational advantage identified by investors is market opportunity. There is recognition of the existence of a growing and affluent middle class, which will drive consumer spending. Of the Irish MNEs which have invested in China, over 80% described market opportunity as the rationale underlying their investment in China. The focus of Irish MNEs on market opportunity confirms that Ireland conforms to the categorisation of investors in China as proposed by Li and Li (1999), who found that MNEs from developed economies will focus on market opportunity in China, whereas MNEs from developing economies will be attracted by the low-wage environment. The investors also identified the importance of investing in China if an Irish firm is supplying another MNE which decides to invest in China, as a means of preserving existing supply contracts. Irish MNEs did not identify the incentives available from the Chinese authorities as particularly pertinent to their decision to invest. While the literature on incentives is inconclusive, the views of Irish MNEs support Devereux and Griffith (1998), who argue that incentives do not influence the decision to invest abroad, but once the decision has been taken, they play a role in the choice of location.

Research among the executives of MNEs which have invested in China identified locational disadvantages which China may pose. The principal locational challenges are in the areas of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and the enforceability of contract law. The threat to IPR is significant for MNEs in the high-tech sector. One executive pointed out that IPR is the core asset of the MNE and, should this ownership advantage be compromised, a threat to the operation of the MNE would be posed. Regarding contract law, an apparent contradiction among executives was identified. While the executives pointed to the difficulty in legally enforcing contracts, they also spoke of negotiating detailed contracts which sought to cover all eventualities. This apparent contradiction results from the executives seeking to set out responsibilities in some detail so as to use this level of detail to negotiate solutions, should difficulties emerge. Lawyers were interviewed as part of this research to seek their views on this issue. They pointed to the historical context within which the Rule of Law issue must be seen. The focus of the Chinese Government since the reform process commenced in 1979 has clearly been on the creation of an environment conducive to economic growth and they have been spectacularly successful in this regard. Allied to this is the strong cultural heritage which China exhibits, particularly in the area of guanxi. One of the effects of the pervasiveness of Chinese culture is that the Rule of Relationships rather than the Rule of Law dominates. (Jones, 1994) Jones suggests that this occurrence supports the view that China is replicating what has happened in the other four Dragon Economies in Asia, where the Weberian concept of the Rule of Law has not developed.

While executives seek to negotiate detailed contracts, there is also the realisation that relationships and not legal documents are the fundamental basis upon which business in conducted. This finding supports Macauley’s (1963) seminal work on the nature of contract law. Indeed, in this respect conducting business in China is not dissimilar to conducting business in any other country.

A common thread that emerges from the research is the strongly regional nature of China. Provincial and municipal governments have considerable powers and offer competing incentives to attract inward FDI. However, the principal regional variation is in purchasing power parities. The developed eastern seaboard has the highest levels of disposable income, making this the most attractive location for investors seeking to exploit market opportunity. The potential consumer market is not one in five of the world’s population but approximately 350 million people located in the cities along China’s eastern seaboard, who have been the main beneficiaries of the opening-up policy.

Lieberthal and Lieberthal (2004) identify management shortcomings as a constraint on the competitiveness of indigenous Chinese companies. They see the problem as embedded in the economic system because of the dominance of state-owned enterprises in the major manufacturing and service industries, which dominance has resulted in greater emphasis being placed on political skills than on modern management techniques. This presents an opportunity for Irish investors. Irish MNEs which have the ability to invest overseas will have developed ownership advantages within the context of Dunning’s eclectic paradigm. These ownership advantages often involve management skills.

In addition, if economic growth in Ireland is to be sustained, one of the contributory factors will be proactive outward FDI focused on developing economies such as China. ‘[R]ises in future economic welfare will depend primarily on increases in productivity. FDI can enhance the productivity of the Irish economy, by allowing Irish firms to focus on areas where they have a comparative advantage, by creating new market opportunities for a firm’s existing products and by promoting the creation on new dynamic firms’. (O’Toole, 2007: 397)

There is an understandable hesitancy to engage in a debate on outward FDI as it can be presented in an emotive manner as the relocation of Irish jobs to low-cost locations overseas. While the literature on the effects of outward FDI on employment is not conclusive, the evidence points towards vertical FDI’s being complementary to employment in the home economy. There is an argument that society should engage in a broad discussion on Irish outward FDI. Given the increasing levels of outward FDI, with Ireland now a net exporter of FDI, this issue is likely to require attention in the coming years. In order to have an informed debate, there is a need for the creation of a broader statistical database on FDI.
Consideration might be given to an extension of the current high range of services provided to exporting MNEs to those Irish MNEs which wish to invest in third country markets. Consideration might also be given to the negotiation of a Bilateral Investment Agreement with China. It would also be necessary to continue to lobby the Chinese authorities in the areas of protection of IPR and national treatment.
The insights gained from this study are a contribution not only to the academic debate on Irish FDI in China but will hopefully stimulate the study of Irish FDI in the other important developing economy, namely India. This would allow a comparative dimension to be explored and facilitate the development of a model for Irish FDI in developing economies.

Conclusion
This research identified a divergence in Irish investment patterns in China from that in the traditional destinations for Irish outward FDI. The nature of FDI in China is different, with most of it being in the traded sector. Challenges associated with investing in China were also identified, with China’s legal environment posing locational challenges. Failure to take due account of such challenges, through the appropriate exploitation of the MNE’s internalisation advantage, could pose a threat to ownership advantages.
It is easy to set out here the challenges that investors face, as these have been highlighted during the performance of the research. However, what cannot be over-emphasised is the enormous potential which China offers. Those MNEs which moved into China early are now reaping the benefits. China is simply too large a market and too important a market for MNEs to ignore, if they wish to develop an international footprint. If Irish MNEs would engage in China more deeply and in a more sustained manner, their efforts would be sure to contribute to the strengthening of the Irish economy.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
– Agarwal, J. (1980), ‘Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol 116, pp.739-73.
– Aharoni, Y. (1966), The Foreign Investment Decision Process, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Graduate School of Business.
– Alcock, P., (2004), ‘Social Policy and Professional Practice’, in Becker, S. and – Brynam, A. (eds.), Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.
– Ambler, T. and Styles, C. (2000), ‘The Future of Relational Research in International Marketing: Constructs and Conduits’, International Marketing Review, vol. 17:3, pp.492-508.
– American Chamber of Commerce Shanghai (2005), White Paper 2005, Shanghai: The American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai.
– Arias, J. (1998), ‘A Relationship Marketing Approach to Guanxi’, European Journal of Marketing, vol.32:1, pp.145-56.
– Arksey, H. (2004), ‘Semi-structured and Unstructured Interviewing’, in – Becker, S. and Brynam, A. (eds.), Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.
– Arvidsson, N. (1997), ‘Internationalisation of service firms: Strategic considerations’, Chryssochoidis, G., Miller, C. & Clegg, J. (Eds.), Internationalisation Strategies, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
– A T Kearney (2005), FDI Confidence Index, Global Business Policy Council, 2005, Vol 8, Virginia: A T Kearney.
– Bajo-Rubio, O. and Sosvilla-Rivero, S. (1994), ‘An Econometric Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment in Spain 1964-89’, Southern Economic Journal, vol 61, pp.104-20.
– Baranson, J. (1970), ‘Technology Transfer through the International Firm’, American Economic Review, vol60, pp.435-40.
– Barry, F. (2004), ‘Prospects for Ireland in an Enlarged Economy’, The World Economy, vol 27:6, pp. 829-52.
– Barry, F. (2006), ‘Globalisation through the lens of Irish History’, Saad, M. and Leen, M. (eds) Trade, Aid and Development: Essays in Honour of Helen O’Neill, Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
– Barry, F., Gorg, H. and McDowell, A. (2003), ‘Outward FDI and the Investment Development Path of a Late-Industrialising Economy: Evidence from Ireland’, Regional Studies, vol. 37.4, pp.341-9.
– Bauman, H. (1975), ‘Merger Theory, Property Rights and the Pattern of US Investment in Canada’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol 111, pp.676-98. Beijing Review Publishers, Beijing Review, 24 January 1975, Beijing: Beijing Review Publishers.
– Bell, J. (2005), Doing Your Research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education and social science, 4th ed, Buckingham: St. Edmundsbury Press.
– Berghout, L. (2003), ‘China Tomorrow’, Harvard Business Review, vol 81:1, pp.69-79.
– Bergsten, C.; Gill, B.; Lardy, N. and Mitchell, D. (2006), China: The Balance Sheet, New York: Public Affairs.
– Bernstein, R. and Dicker, R. (1994), ‘Human Rights First’, Foreign Policy, 94 pp.44-5 cited in Breslin S. (2005), ‘Power and Production: Rethinking China’s Global Economic Role’, Review of International Studies, Vol 31, Issue 4.
– Bjorkman, I. and Kock, S. (1995), ‘Social Relationships and Business Networks: The Case of Western Companies in China’, International Business Review, vol. 4:4, pp.519-527.
– Blomstrom, M., Lipsey, R. and Kulchyck, K. (1988), ‘U.S. and Swedish Direct Investment and Export’, in Baldwin, R. (ed), Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
– Blonigen B. and Feenstra R. (1996), Protectionist Threats and Foreign Direct Investment, NBER Working Paper No. 5475.
– Borensztein, E. DeGregorio, J and Lee, J. (1995), How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? NBER Working Paper no. 5057.
– Brainard, S. and Riker, D. (1997), Are U.S. Multinationals exporting U.S. jobs?, NBER Working Paper No. 5958.
– Breslin, S. (2005), ‘Power and Production: Rethinking China’s Global Economic Role’, Review of International Studies, Vol 31, Issue 4.
– Bryman, A. (2004), Social Research Methods, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
– Buckley, P. (1987), The Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, Stockholm: Almquist and Wicksell.
– Buckley, P. (1989), The Multinational Enterprise: Theory and Applications, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
– Buckley, P. (2006), ‘Stephen Hymer: Three Phases, one approach?’, International Business Review, vol. 15, pp.140-7.
– Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1976), The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.
– Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1985), The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.
– Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1988), ‘A Theory of cooperation in International Business’, in Contractor, F. and Lorange, P. (eds) Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
– Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1996), ‘An Economic Model of International Joint Ventures’ Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 27, pp.849- 76. London: Macmillan.
– Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1998), ‘Models of the Multinational Enterprise’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 29:1, pp.21-44.
– Buckley, P. and Castro, F. (1998), ‘The Investment Development Path: the case of Portugal’, Transnational Corporations, vol.7, no.1.
– Buckley, P. and Jehle, E. (1995), ‘Forms of Entrepreneurial Cooperation between Chinese and Foreign Enterprises: Taxation Implications’, in Buckley, P. (ed) Foreign Direct Investment and Multinational Enterprises, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
– Cantwell and Bellack (1998), ‘How Important is Foreign Direct Investment?’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol 60, pp.99-106.
– Cantwell, J. and Santangelo, G. (2002), ‘M&As and the Global Strategies of TNCs’, The Developing Economies, vol, XL-4, pp. 400-34.
– Cassidy, J. (2002), Japanese Direct Investment in China: Locational Determinants and Characteristics, London: Routledge.
– Casson, M. (1987), The Firm and the Market: Studies in Multinational Enterprises and the Scope of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
– Caves, R. (1982), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
– Caves, R. (1996), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 2nd ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
– Chakrabarti, A. (2003), ‘A Theory of the Spatial Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment’, International Review of Economics and Finance, 12, pp.149–169.
– Chan, F. (2003), A Business Guide to China: 15 Fallacies of Investing in China, Lincoln: iUniverse.
– Chen, A. (1992), An Introduction to the Legal System of the People’s Republic of China, Singapore: Butterworths Asia.
– Chen, A. (1999), ‘Rational Law, Economic Development and the Case of China’, Social and Legal Studies, vol, 8(1), pp.97-120.
– Chen, T. and Ku, Y. (2000), ‘The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Firm Growth: The Case of Taiwan’s Manufacturers’, Japan and the World Economy, vol 12, pp.153-172.
– Chen, T. and Yang, C. (1999), ‘Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: comparison between Expansionary FDI and Defensive FDI’, Taiwan Economic Review, vol 27, pp.215-240.
– Chung, L.; Ng-Ming, A.; Ignace, N. and; Mee-Kau, N. (2002), ‘Chinese Managerial Activities: Culture versus Local Isomorphism’, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol 8, No 3, pp. 1-15.
– Child, J. and Tse, D. (2001), ‘China’s Transition and Its Implications for International Business’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 5-21.
– Clarke, D. (1995), ‘The Execution of Civil Judgments in China’ China Quarterly, vol. 141, pp.65-81.
– Creswell, J. (1998), Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions, London: Sage Publications.
– CSO (2006), Balance of Payments 2005, Dublin: CSO.
– Culem, C. (1988), ‘The Locational Determinants of Foreign Investments Among Industrialised Countries’, European Economic Review, vol 32, pp.885-904.
– Daniels, J. and Radebough, L. (1995), International Business: Environments and Operations, New York: Addison Wesley.
– Davies, H., Thomas, K., Sherriff, T. and Yiu-hing, W. (1995), ‘The Benefits of Guanxi: The Value of Relationships in Developing the Chinese Market’, Industrial Marketing Management, vol24:3, pp.207-14.
– Department of Finance (2006), Irish Double Taxation Agreements,
http://www.finance.gov.ie/documents/tsg/2004 /tsg06aappendix1.rtf
– De Vaus, D. (1996), Surveys in Social Research, 4th ed., London: UCL Press.
– Devereux, M. and Griffith, R. (1998), ‘Taxes and the location of Production: evidence from a panel of US multinationals’, Journal of Public Economics, 68, pp.335-367.
– Dey, I. (1993), Qualitative Data Analysis; A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists, London: Routledge.
– Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. (1997), ‘Law, Lawyers and Social Capital: ‘Rule of Law’ versus Relational Capitalism’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 6(1), pp.109-41.
– Duke, K., (2002), ‘Getting beyond the ‘Official Line’: Reflections on Dilemmas of Access, Knowledge and Power in Researching Policy Networks’, Journal of Social Policy, vol. 31:1, pp.39-59.
– Dunning, J. (1977), ‘Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: A Search for an Eclectic Approach’, in Hesselborn, P., Ohlin, B. and Wijkman, P. (eds) The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London: Macmillan.
– Dunning, J. (1979a), ‘Explaining changing patterns of international production: in defense of the eclectic theory’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 41, pp.269-95.
– Dunning, J. (1979b), ‘Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: Some Empirical Effects’, Journal of International Business Studies, no.11, pp.9-13.
– Dunning, J. (1980), ‘Towards an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 11(1), pp. 9–31.
– Dunning, J. (1981), ‘Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: towards a dynamic or developmental approach’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 117, pp.30-64.
– Dunning, J. (1986), ‘The Investment Development Cycle Revisited’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 122, pp.667-77.
– Dunning, J. (1988), ‘The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 19, pp. 1-31.
– Dunning, J. (1995), ‘Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in the age of alliance capitalism’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 26, pp.461–491.
– Dunning, J. (1995b), Reevaluating the Benefits of Foreign Direct Investment, Discussion paper no 188, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
– Dunning, J. (2000a), ‘The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity’, International Business Review, Vol 9, pp. 163–190.
– Dunning, J. (2000b), ‘The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Personal Perspective’, in Pitelis, C. and Sugden, R. (eds) The Nature of the Transnational Firm, pp.119-39, London: Routledge.
– Dunning, J. (2001), ‘The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol 8 No 2, pp. 173-190.
– Dunning, J. (2006), ‘When I met Hymer: Some personal recollections’, International Business Review, vol. 15, pp. 115-23.
– Dunning, J. and Narula, R. (1996), ‘The Investment Development Path Revisited: some emerging issues’, in Dunning, J. and Narula, R. (eds), Foreign Direct Investment and Governments, London: Routledge.
– Du Pont M. (2000), Foreign Direct Investment in Transitional Economies, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
– Eckaus, R. (1987), ‘A Survey of the Theory of Direct Investment in Developing Countries’, in Robinson, R. (1987), Direct Foreign Investment: Costs and Benefits, Massachusetts: MIT.
– Economy, E. (2004), ‘Don’t Break the Engagement’ Foreign Affairs, May/June 2004.
– Eng, J. (2005), China Investment: Environment and Strategies, Lincoln: iUniverse.
– Enterprise Ireland (2005), Doing Business in China: A Guide for Irish Companies, Dublin: Enterprise Ireland.
– European Commission (2003), A Maturing Partnership: Shared interests and Challenges in EU-China Relations, Brussels: Official Publications Office. European Union Chamber of Commerce in China (2005), European Business in China: Position Paper 2005, Beijing: EU Chamber of Commerce.
– Fay, B. (1996), Contemporary Philosophy of Social Sciences, Blackwell.
– Feldstein, M. (1994), Taxes, Leverage and the National return on Outbound Foreign Direct Investment, NBER Working Paper no. 4689.
– Fitz, J. and Halpin, D. (1995), ‘Brief Encounters: Researching education policy-making in elite settings’, in Salisbury, J.and Delamont, S. (eds) Qualitative Studies in Education, Aldershot: Avebury.
– Foreign Affairs Committee (2000), Tenth Report, Session 1999-2000: Relations with the People’s Republic of China, para 108, Norwich: HMSO.
– Foreign Invest Department (2005), Shanghai: Guide to Investment 2005, Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Investment Commission.
– Forfás (2001), Statement on Outward Direct Investment, Dublin: Forfás.
– Forfás and Enterprise Ireland (2004), Annual Business Survey of Economic Impact, Dublin: Forfás.
– Forfás (2006), International Trade and Investment Report, Dublin: Forfás.
– Foster, J. (1995), ‘Informal Social Control and Community Crime Prevention’, British Journal of Criminology, 35: pp.563-82, cited in Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
– Froot, K. (1993), Foreign Direct Investment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
– Gamble, (2002), Investing in China: Legal, Financial and Regulatory Risk, Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.
– Goldberg, M. (1972), ‘The Determinants of US Direct Investment in the EEC: comment’, American Economic review, vol 62, pp.692-9.
– Gosset, D. (2006a), ‘The Dragon’s Metamorphosis: China’s Political Modernization – The 17th Congress of the Communist Party’, in Perspective, Madrid: Botin Foundation.
– Government of Ireland (2005), Asia Strategy, Dublin: Stationery Office.
– Graham, E. (2006), ‘Comment on Peter J. Buckley: ‘Stephen Hymer: Three phases, one approach?’, International Business Review, vol. 15, pp. 148-50.
– Graham, J. and Lam, N. (2003), ‘The Chinese Negotiation’, Harvard Business Review on Doing Business in China, Harvard: Harvard Business School Publishing, pp. 31-56.
– Grubaugh, S. (1987), ‘Determinants of Direct Foreign Investment’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 69, no.1, pp149-52.
– Guisinger, S. (1985), Investment Incentives and Performance Requirements, New York: Praeger Publishers.
– Guthrie, D. (1998), ‘The Declining Significance of Guanxi in China’s Economic Transition’, The China Quarterly, No. 154 (Jun. 1998) pp. 254-282.
– Hanson, Mataloni and Slaughter (2001), ‘Expansion Strategies of US MNCs’ in Rodrik and Collins (eds), Brookings Trade Forum 2001.
– Head, K. and Ries, J. (2001), ‘Overseas Investment and firm exports’, Review of International Economics, 9(1): pp.108-122.
– Hewko, J. (2002), Does the Rule of Law Matter?: Democracy and Rule of Law Project, NBER Working Paper No. 26.
– Hines, J. (1996), ‘Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign direct Investment in America’, American Economic review, vol86, pp. 1076-94.
– Hirsch, S. (1980), ‘An international trade and investment theory of the firm’, in The Determinants of Foreign Investments: Relevant Aspects for Assessing the Role of Investment Incentive, Paris: OECD.
– Hirshberg (1993), ‘Consistency and Change in American Perceptions of China’, Political Behavior,Vol 15, No 3.
– Huang, Y. (2002), Selling China: Foreign Direct Investment During the Reform Era, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
– Hughes, H. and You, P. (1969), Foreign Investment and Industrialisation in Singapore, Canberra: ANU Press.
– Hymer, S. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: a study of direct foreign investment, Massachusetts: MIT PhD thesis.
– Hymer, S. (1970), ‘The Efficiency (contradictions) of multinational corporations’, American Economic Review, vol. LX(2), pp.441-8.
– IBEC (2006), Opening Doors to Asia: Trade and Investment Survey, Dublin: Irish Business and Employers Confederation.
– Ietto-Gillies, G. (2005), Transnational Corporations and International Production: Concepts, Theories and Effects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
– Itoh, Fumio (ed) (1997), China in the Twenty-First Century: Politics, Economy and Society, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
– International Finance Corporation (1997), Foreign Direct Investment: Lessons of Experience, Number 5, Washington: International Monetary Fund (1993), Balance of Payments – Manual, 5th ed,.Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
– Jespersen, T. (1996), American Images of China, 1931-1949, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
– Jones, C. (1994), ‘Capitalism, Globalization and Rules of Law: An Alternative Trajectory of Legal Change in China’, Social and Legal Studies, vol. 3 (1994), pp. 195-221.
– Jun, J. (1989), Tax Policy and International Direct Investment, NBER Working paper no.3048.
– Ke, M., Jun, L. et al (2004), China Business, Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
– Khanna, T. (2005), ‘Strategies that Fit Emerging Markets’, Harvard Business Review, vol.6, pp.63-76
– Kindleberger,C. (1969), American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment, New Haven: Yale University Press
– King, G., Keohane, R. and Verba. S., (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Chicester: Princeton University Press.
– Kravis, I. and Lipsey, R. (1982), ‘The Location of Overseas Production and Production for Export by U.S. Multinational Firms’, Journal of International Economics, Vol 12.
– Kravis, I. and Lipsey, R. (1988), The Effect of Multinational Firms’ Foreign Operations on their Domestic Employment, NBER Working Paper no. 2760.
– Kvale, S. (1996), Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Sage Publications.
– Leedy, P. and Ormrod, J. (2004), Practical Research Planning and Design, 8th ed, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
– Li, F. and Li, J. (1999), Foreign Investment in China, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
– Li, L., Lam, K. and Qian, G. (2001), ‘Does Culture affect behavior and Performance of Firms? The Case of Joint Ventures in China’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol 32:1, pp. 115-31.
– Lieberthal, K. and Lieberthal, G. (2004), ‘The Great Transition’, Harvard Business Review on Doing Business in China, Harvard: Harvard Business School Publishing, pp. 1-30.
– Lim, D. (1983), ‘Fiscal Incentive and Direct Foreign Investment in Less Developed Countries’, The Journal of Development Studies, 19.
– Lin, Y. and Stoianoff, N. (2004), ‘Foreign Investment in China: The Cross-Cultural Dimension’, Macquarie Business Law Journal¸ 2004: vol 1.
– Lipsey, R. (1999), ‘The Role of FDI in International Capital Flows’, in Feldstein, M. (ed), International Capital Flows, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
– Lipsey, R. (2000), Interpreting Developed Countries: Foreign Direct Investment, NBER Working Paper no. 7810.
– Lipsey, R. (2001), Foreign Direct Investment and the Operations of Multinational Firms: Concepts, Data and History, NBER Working Paper no. 8665.
– LOCOmonitor (2006), Trends in Irish Outward Direct Investment, unpublished report commissioned by Forfás, cited in O’Toole, R. (2007), Outward Direct Investment and Productivity, Dublin: Forfás.
– Lubman, S. (1995), ‘Introduction: the Future of Chinese Law’, China Quarterly, vol. 141, pp.1-21.
– Lucas, R. (1993), ‘On the Determinants of Direct Foreign Investment: Evidence from East and South Asia’, World Development, Vol 21.
– Luo, Y. (1998), International Investment Strategies in the People’s Republic of China, Aldershot: Ashgate.
– Luo, Y. (2000), Multinational Corporations in China, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
– McGrath, R., MacMilan, E., Yang, E. and Tsai, W. (1992), ‘Does Culture Endure or is it Malleable?’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 7(7), pp. 441-58.
– McGregor, J. (2005) One Billion Customers, New York: Free Press.
– McGregor, R (2007), ‘Why fast-changing China is turning back to Confucius’, Financial Times, 11 April 2007.
– McManus, J. (1972), ‘The Theory of the International Firm’, in Pacquet, G. (ed), The Multinational Firm and the Nation State, Galt, Ontario: Collier-Macmillan.
– Macaulay, S. (1963), ‘Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study’, American Sociological Review, vol.28, no.1, pp.55-67.
– Macdonald, S. and Hellgren, B. (2004), ‘The Interview in International Business Research: Problems We Would Rather Not Talk About’, in  Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research for International Business, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
– Mackerras, C. (1991), Western Images of China, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
– Markusen, P. (1985), ‘The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade’, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol.9, no. 2, pp.169-89.
– Markusen, P. (1989), ‘Service trade by the multinational enterprise’, in Enderwick, P. (Ed.) Multinational Service Firms, London: Routledge.
– Miles, M. (1979), ‘Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp.590-601, cited in Bryman, A. (2004), Social Research Methods, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
– Mitchell, W., Shaver, J. and Yeung, B. (1993), ‘Performance Following Changes of International Presence in Domestic and Transition Economies’, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 24, pp.647-69.
– Mo, J. (1997), ‘Foreign Investment Law’, in Wang, C. and Zhang, X., Introduction to Chinese Law, Sweet & Maxwell Asia.
– Moosa, I. (2002), Foreign Direct Investment: Theory, Evidence and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
– Moore, M. (1993), ‘Determinants of German Manufacturing Direct Investment 1980-1988, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol 129, pp.120-37.
– Morgan, J. (2004), ‘Distinguishing Truth, Knowledge and Belief: A Philosophical Contribution to the Problem of Images of China’, Modern China, Vol 30, No. 3, pp.398-427.
– Mosher, S. (1990), China Misperceived: American Illusions and Chinese Reality, New York: Basic Books.
– Mosher, S. (2001) ‘Hegemon: China’s Plans to Dominate Asia and the World’, cited in Breslin, S. (2005), ‘Power and Production: Rethinking China’s Global Economic Role’, Review of International Studies, Vol 31, Issue 4.
– Mulreany, M. (1999), ‘Cost Benefit Analysis’ in Mulreany, M. (ed), Economic and Financial Evaluation, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
– Mundell, R. (1957), ‘International Trade and Factor Mobility’, American Economic Review, 47.
– Nankani, G. (1979), The Intercountry Distribution of Direct Foreign Investment, New York: Garland.
– National Council for US_China Trade (1990), Special Report on US Investment in China, Washington DC: Department of Commerce.
– Navaretti, G. and Venables, A. (2004), Multinational Firms in the World Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
– Newman, R. and Sullivan, D. (1988), ‘Econometric Analysis of Business Tax Impacts on Industrial Location: What do we know and how do we know it?’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol 23, pp.215-234.
– O’Hagan, J. & Newman, C. (2005), The Economy of Ireland, 9th ed, Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
– Ohlin, B. (1933), Inter-regional and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
– OECD (2000), Main Determinants and Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment on China’s Economy, Working Paper on International Investment, Paris: OECD.
– OECD (2003), China: Progress and Reform Challenges, Paris: OECD.
– OECD (2004), Foreign Direct Investment into OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
– OECD (2005), Governance in China, Paris: OECD.
– OECD (2006), Glossary of Foreign Direct Investment Terms and Definitions, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/1/2487495.pdf
– Osland, G. (1994), ‘Successful Operating Strategies in the Performance of US-China Joint Ventures’, Journal of International Marketing, vol 2:4, pp.53-78.
– O’Toole, R (2007), ‘Outward Direct Investment and Productivity’ in Perspectives on Irish Productivity, Dublin: Forfás, pp. 385-401.
– Overholt, W. (1993), China: The Next Economic Superpower, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
– Overholt, W. (2001), Crouching Profits: Hidden Markets, Venture Capital Conference 2001, Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce.
– Pastor, A. and Gosset, D. (2005), The EU-China Relationship: A Key to the 21st Century Order, Madrid: Elcano Royal Institute, http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/analisis/848.asp
– Peerenboom, R. (2002), China’s Long March Towards Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
– Pei, M. (2001), ‘Does Legal Reform Protect Economic Transactions? Commercial Disputes in China’, in Murrell, P. (ed), Assessing the Value of Law in transition Economies, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
– Peng, Z. (2004) ‘Representation of China: an Across Time Analysis of Coverage in the New York Times and Los Angeles Times’, Asian Journal of Communications, Vol 14, No. 1, March 2004, pp.53-67.
– Perkins, D. (1994), ‘Completing China’s Move to the Market’, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 8, pp.23-46.
– Pinker, R., (2004), ‘The Role of Theory in Social Policy Research’ in Becker, S. and Brynam, A. (eds.), Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.
– Potter, P. (1995), ‘Foreign Investment Law in the People’s Republic of China: Dilemmas of State Control’, China Quarterly, vol. 141, pp.155-85.
– Puska, S. (1998), ‘New Century, Old Thinking: The dangers of the Perceptual Gap in U.S.-China Relations’, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute.
– Rapley, T. (2004), ‘Interviews’ in Seale, C., Gobo, G. et al, Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage.
– Reuber, G., Crockell, H., Emersen, M. and Gallais-Hamonno, G. (1973), Private Foreign Investment in Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press and OECD.
– Riskin, C. (1987), China’s Political Economy: The Quest for Development Since 1949, New York: Oxford University Press.
– Robins, F. (1996), ‘Marketing in a Managed Economy’, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, vol. 14:3, pp.43-56.
– Robson, C. (2000), Small-Scale Evaluation: Principles and Practice, London: Sage.
– Roxenhall, T. and Ghauri, P. (2006), ‘Use of the Written Contract in Long-Lasting Business Relationships’, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33, pp. 261-8.
– Ruane, J. (2005), Essentials of Research Methods, Oxford: Blackwell.
– Rugman, A. (1980), ‘Internalization as a General Theory of Foreign Direct Investment: A Re-appraisal of the Literature’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol 116, pp. 365-379.
– Saunders, R. (1983), ‘The Determinants of Inter-industry Variation of Foreign Ownership in Canadian Manufacturing’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol 15, pp.77-84.
– Schneider, F. and Frey, B. (1985), ‘Economic and Political Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment’, World Development, Vol 13.
– Scott-Kennel, J. (2004), ‘Foreign Direct Investment to New Zealand’, Business Review, Spring 2004, pp.41-49.
– Segal, G. (1999), ‘Does China Matter?’ Foreign Affairs Vol 78:5.
– Shenkar, O. (1990), ‘International Joint Ventures’ Problems in China: Risks and Remedies’, Long Range Planning, vol. 23, pp.555-78.
– Smart, A. (1993), ‘Gifts, Bribes and Guanxi: A Reconsideration of Bourdieu’s Social Capital’ Cultural Anthropology, vol. 8(3), pp.388-408.
– Song, L. (1998), ‘China’ in McLeod, R. & Garnaut, R. (eds), East Asia in Crisisfrom being a miracle to needing one?, London: Routledge.
– Spence, J. (1990), The Search for Modern China, New York: Norton.
– Sprague, J. (2005), Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers, Lanham: Altamira.
– State Statistical Bureau (2005), Statistical Yearbook for Asia and Pacific, Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
– Stiglitz, J. and Shahid, Y. (2001), Rethinking the East Asia Miracle, New York: Oxford University Press.
– Strange, Susan (1996), ‘The Retreat of the State’ cited in Breslin, S. (2005), ‘Power and Production: Rethinking China’s Global Economic Role’, Review of International Studies, Vol 31, Issue 4.
– Tain-Jy, C., Yin-Hwa, K and Meng-Chun, L. (1994), ‘Direct Foreign Investment in High-Wage Countries vs Low-Wage Countries: The Case of Taiwan’, Paper presented at 21st Pacific trade and Development Conference, Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong, 1-3 June.
– Tan, C. and Guo, L. (1995), China: Risk, Rewards, Regulations, Singapore: Cassia Communications.
– Teagarden, M. and Von Glinow, M. (1990), ‘Sino-Foreign Strategic Alliances Types and Related Operating Characteristics’, International Studies of Management and Organization, Spring, pp. 19-33.
– Transparency International (2005), Transparency International Annual Report 2005, Berlin: Transparency International.
– Transparency International (2010), Corruptions Perception Index 2010, Berlin: Transparency International.
– Tsang, E. (1998), ‘Can Guanxi be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage for Doing Business in China?’, Academy of Management Executive, vol.12:2, pp.64-73.
– Tse, D., Kam-hon, L., Vertinsky, I. and Wehrung, D. (1988), ‘Does Culture Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness and Risk Adjustment’, International Journal of Marketing, vol.52, pp.81-95.
– Tureq, D. (1995), ‘India and China: Asia’s Non-Identical Twins’, The Mc Kinsey Quarterly, no.2, pp.24-37.
– United Nations (1993), Report of the Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts, New York: United Nations.
– UNCTAD (1999), World Investment Report: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development, New York: United Nations.
– UNCTAD (2000), World Investment Report: Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development, New York: United Nations.
– UNCTAD (2006), World Investment Report, New York: United Nations.
– UNCTAD (2007), Total Number of Bilateral Investment Agreements Concluded: China, http://www.unctad.org/sections/dite_pcbb/docs/china.pdf
– Unger, R. (1976), Law in modern Society, New York: Free Press.
– Van Den Bulcke, D., Zhang, H. and Do Céu Esteves, M. (2003), European Union Direct Investment in China: Characteristics, Challenges and Perspectives, London: Routledge.
– Van Maanen, J. and Kolb, D. (1985), ‘The Professional Apprentice: Observations on Fieldwork Roles in two Organizational Settings’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 4: 1-33.
– Vaupal, J. (1971), Characteristics and Motivation of the U.S. Corporations which Manufacture Abroad, Paper presented at the meeting of the Atlantic Institute, Paris, June 1971.
– Vernon, R. (1966), ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.80, pp. 190-270.
– Vernon, R. (1979), ‘The Product cycle hypothesis in a new international environment’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol.41, No.4, pp.255-67.
– Van Honacker, W. (2004), ‘When Good Guanxi Turns Bad’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 82:4, pp. 18-19.
– Wang, F. (1992), ‘The Evolution of Socialist Practice and Network of Social Relations in China’, in Zhou X. (ed), State-Society Relations in Contemporary China, Taipei: Guiguan Books.
– Wang, W. (2006), The China Executive, Bretton: 2WPublishing.
– Wei, Yingqi (2003), Foreign Direct Investment in China, Lancaster University Management School Working Paper 2003/002.
– Wei, Y. and Liu, X. (2001) Foreign Direct Investment in China: Determinants and Impact, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
– Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkari, R., Pentinnen, H. and Tahvanainen, M. (2002)
‘Corporate Elites as Informants in Qualitative International Business Research’, International Business Review, vol. 11 pp.611-28.
– Wheeler, D. and Mody, A. (1990), Risks and Rewards in International Location Tournaments: The Case of US Firms, Washington DC: The World Bank.
– Wheeler, D. and Mody, A. (1992), ‘International Investment Location Decisions: The Case for U.S. Firms’, Journal of International Economics, Vol 33.
– Williamson, O. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.
– Xianming, D. (2004), Overview of China’s Ready-Mix Concrete Industry and Opportunities and Challenges for Foreign-Invested Companies, Paper presented at Concrete Division of the Construction Industry Association of China, September 2004, Kunming.
– Xin, K. and Pearce, J. (1996), ‘Guanxi: Connections as Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, pp. 1641-58.
– Yang, M. (1986), The Art of Social Relationships in China, PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
– Yang, M. (1988), ‘The Modernity of Power in the Chinese Socialist Order’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 3, pp.409-27.
– Yin, K. (1994), Case Study Research: design and methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
– Zhang J. (2002), Journal of Yunnan Finance & Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, Kunming: Yunnan University of Finance and Economic.

image_pdfimage_print
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Leave a Reply





What is 19 + 16 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)
  • About

    Rozenberg Quarterly aims to be a platform for academics, scientists, journalists, authors and artists, in order to offer background information and scholarly reflections that contribute to mutual understanding and dialogue in a seemingly divided world. By offering this platform, the Quarterly wants to be part of the public debate because we believe mutual understanding and the acceptance of diversity are vital conditions for universal progress. Read more...
  • Support

    Rozenberg Quarterly does not receive subsidies or grants of any kind, which is why your financial support in maintaining, expanding and keeping the site running is always welcome. You may donate any amount you wish and all donations go toward maintaining and expanding this website.

    10 euro donation:

    20 euro donation:

    Or donate any amount you like:

    Or:
    ABN AMRO Bank
    Rozenberg Publishers
    IBAN NL65 ABNA 0566 4783 23
    BIC ABNANL2A
    reference: Rozenberg Quarterly

    If you have any questions or would like more information, please see our About page or contact us: info@rozenbergquarterly.com
  • Like us on Facebook

  • Follow us on Twitter

  • Recent Articles

  • Rozenberg Quarterly Archives