ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ Table Of Contents

No comments yet

logo 2006Table of Contents ISSA Proceedings 2006 – Work in Progress

Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard & Bart Garssen – Preface
Mark A. Aakhus & Alena L. Vasilyeva – Managing Disagreement In Multiparty Deliberation
Donn P. Abbott – Modern Rhetoric And The End Of Argument
Andrew Aberdein – Virtue Argumentation
Theodora Achourioti  – Fallacies And Context-Dependence: Considering The Strategic Maneuvering Approach
Martin T. Adam – Classes Of Moral Agent And The Art Of Persuasion In The Pali Nikayas Jesús Alcolea-Banegas -Visual Arguments In Film
Jesús Alcolea-Banegas – Visual Arguments In Film
Habibe Aldağ & Ahmet Doğanay – The Effects Of Textual And Graphical-Textual Argumentation Software As Cognitive Tools On Development Of Argumentation skills
Donka Alexandrova – Agonistics Among The Wooden, Democratic And Monarchic Discourses In Contemporary Bulgaria
J. Francisco Álvarez – The Risk Of Arguing. From Persuasion To Dissuasion Rodica Amel  – The Challenging Force Of Dissuasion
Rodica Amel – The Challenging Force Of Dissuasion
Bilal Amjarso  – Addressing Anticipated Countermoves As A Form Of Strategic Manoeuvring
Corina Andone – The Strategic Use Of Antithesis In The Argumentation Stage Of A Critical Discussion
Kevin T. Baaske & Megan A. Baaske – Hurricane Katrina: An Argumentative Analysis Of Race And Gender Issues In The Media Coverage Of A Natural And National Disaster
Susan J. Balter-Reitz & Karen A. Stewart – A Perfect Circle: Visual Argument Field And The Definition Of The Middle Class
Hilde van Belle – When You Don’t Have Anything To Prove Strategic Manoeuvering And Rhetorical Argumentation
Lilian Bermejo Luque – The Justification Of  The Normative Nature Of Argumentation Theory
Barbara A. Biesecker – Memorializing In A Time Of Terror: A Case Study Of Public Argument
Frans A.J. Birrer – Hidden Obstructions In Discussions Involving Conductive Argumentation. Core And Surface In The U.S. Debate On The Use Of Data Mining Techniques In The Fight Against Terrorism
J. Anthony Blair – Investigations And The Critical Discussion Model
George Boger – A Foundational Principle Underlying Philosophy Of Argument
Åsa Brumark – Argumentation At The Swedish Family Dinner Table
Lilit Brutian – Arguments In Child Language
Andrew J. Burgess – Irony As Ethical Argumentation In Kierkegaard
Ann E. Burnette & Wayne L. Kraemer – The Argumentative Framework Of Imperial Righteousness: The War Discourse Of George W. Bush
Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet – The A Contrario Argument: A Scorekeeping Model
Linda Carozza – A Pragma-Dialectical Response To Feminist Concerns
Adelino Cattani – Rules Of Refutation And Strategies Of Dissuasion In Debate
Leah Ceccarelli – Creating Controversy About Science And Technology
Mathieu Chaput & Milton N. Campos – A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis Of Online Political Argumentation
Sara Cigada – Past-Oriented And Future-Oriented Emotions In Argumentation For Europe During The Fifties
Daniel H. Cohen – Understanding, Arguments, And Explanations: Cognitive Transformations And The Limits Of Argumentation
Elisia L. Cohen – Rhetoric, Homeland Security, And Geopolitical Context: A Comparative Argument Analysis After Terror Strikes
Catherine Ann Collins – Seeing Is Believing: The Visual Diary Of Paul Wynne
Peter A. Cramer – Controversy Participation As A Function Of Direct Reported Speech In News
Nathaniel I. Córdova – Between Radical Democracy And Civic Virtue: Political Piety And Public Moral Argument

Robert T. Craig – Arguments About “Dialogue” In Practice And Theory
Chiara Degano – Argumentation Theory, Critical Discourse Analysis And Corpus Linguistics: A Case Study
Antoni  Diller – Understanding The Strategy Of Attacking Premises
Marianne Doury – A Bottom-Up Approach To Argument Schemes: The Case Of Comparative Argument
M. Dufour – Didactics And Authority: Towards A Pragma-Didactical Approach
Danielle Endres – “Yucca Mountain Will Become Unhappy And Angry” : Culture, Metaphor, and Argument
Ademar Ferreira – On The Role Of Pragmatics, Rhetoric And Dialectics In Scientific Controversies
Eveline T. Feteris – A Normative Reconstruction Of Arguments From Reasonableness In The Justification Of Judicial Decisions
Maurice A. Finocchiaro – Metadialogues And Meta-Arguments: Krabbe On Formal-Fallacy Criticism
Gerd Fritz – Communication Principles For Controversies – An Historical Perspective
Claudio Fuentes – Towards A “Pragma-Dramatic” Approach To Argumentation
Richard Friemann – Pragma-Dialectics And A Unified Understanding Of Interpersonal Disagreement
Giovanni Gobber – Some Remarks On Interrogativity And Argumentation
G.C. Goddu – Against Making The Linked-Convergent Distinction
G. Thomas Goodnight – The Duties Of Advocacy: Argumentation Under Conditions Of Disparity, Asymmetry, And Difference
Jean Goodwin – Actually Existing Rules For Closing Argument
Trudy Govier – Duets, Cartoons, And Tragedies: Struggles With The Fallacy Of Composition
Jim Gough – Accepting Premises And Systems Of Belief
Miriam Greenfeld – The Invocation Of Time Within Argumentative Discourse In An Asynchronous Internet Environment
Alessandro Grilli – Argumentation, Keywords And Worldviews
Bruce E. Gronbeck – Theorizing Visual Argumentation: Three Approaches To Jacob Riis
Kati Hannken-Illjes – Undoing Premises. The Interrelation Of Argumentation And Narration In Criminal Proceedings
Hans Vilhelm Hansen – Mill On Argumentation
Gerard Hauser  & Virginia C. Sanprie – Women In Combat: Arguments Against Military Women In Combat Through Media Depictions Of Jessica Lynch And Lynndie England
Mika Hietanen – The Gospel Of Matthew As An Argument
David Hitchcock – Why There Is No Argumentum Ad Hominem Fallacy
John Hoaglund – Informal Logic And Pragma Dialectics
Hanns Hohmann – Legal Arguments For Political Violence: The Assassination Of The Duke Of Orléans (1407)
Michael Hoppmann – Dialectical Ideal And Dialectical Training
Isabela Ieţcu-Fairclough –  ‘Status Groups’ Or A ‘Free Market Of Ideas’? An Analysis Of A Romanian Intellectual Polemic In Pragma-Dialectical And Critical Discourse-Analytical Terms
Cornelia Ilie – Argument Refutation Through Definitions And Re-Definitions
Hengameh Irandoust – A Pragmatic Analysis Of Critique And Evaluation
Michael Janas –  What Is The KKK: Metonymy And Synecdoche In Arguments About Racism
Sharon Jessop – Citizenship Education And The Teaching Of Argumentation In Schools
Ralph Jessop – Undesirable Passions: Utopia’s Emotionless Rationality
Ralph H. Johnson – Responding To Objections
Charlotte Jørgensen – The Relevance Of Intention In Argument Evaluation
Mary L. Kahl – An Analysis Of Argument In George Washington’s Newburgh Address: “Address To The Officers Of The Army,” March 15, 1783
Tomohiro Kanke – Reshaping Emperor Hirohito’s Persona: A Study Of Fragmented Arguments In Multiple Texts
Fred J. Kauffeld – Grice’s Analysis Of Utterance-Meaning And Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe
Zornitsa Keremidchieva – The Argument Of Print: State Sovereignty And The Publication Of U.S Congressional Debates
Manfred Kienpointner – Revolutionary rhetoric. Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote“ (1834). A case study
Sheila J. Kindred – Resort To Persuasive Authority: The Use And Abuse Of Legal Argument In Political Discourse
Susan L. Kline – Displaying Reasonableness: Developmental Changes In Two Argument Practices
Geoffrey D. Klinger – Arguing Against The Capitalist State: The Rhetorical And Ideological Struggles Of Eugene Victor Debs
Christian Kock – The Domain Of Rhetorical Argumentation
László I. Komlósi – Perelman’s Vision: Argumentation Schemes As Examples Of Generic Conceptualization In Everyday Reasoning Practices
Marcin Koszowy – A Methodological Approach To Argument Evaluation
Erik C. W. Krabbe – On How To Get Beyond The Opening Stage
A. J. Kreider – Informal Fallacies As Inferences To The Best Explanation
Tone Kvernbekk – Theory And Practice: A Metatheoretical Contribution
Gábor Kutrovátz – A Role For Dialectic In Science Studies
Jan Albert van Laar – Confrontational Manoeuvring By Pointing Out A Pragmatic Inconsistency
Michael Leff – Ad Hominem Argument In The Bush/Kerry Presidential Debates
José Julio León – Justice As Argumentation
Thomas M. Lessl – Scientific Demarcation And Metascience: The National Academy Of Sciences On The Greenhouse Effect And Neo-Darwinism
Elena Lisanyuk – Russian Political Talk Show: Glamour Of Argumentative Discussion – A Case Study
Sacha Mandelcwajg & Michel Marcoccia – The Definition And The Negotiation Of The Norms Of Discussion In Newsgroups: Which Communication Ideal?
Beth Innocenti Manolescu – Shaming Into Argumentation
Roberto Marafioti – Argumentation In Debate: The Parliamentary Speech In Critical Contexts
Roberto Marafioti, Zelma Dumm & María Elena Bitonte – Argumentation And Counter-Argumentation Using A Diaphonic Appropiation In A Parlamentary
Vesel Memedi – The Role Of A Third Party In Argumentative Discourse
Raphaël Micheli – The Argumentative Construction Of Emotions: The Example Of Indignation In Pro-Life Rhetoric
Marta Mignini – Strategic Maneuvering In Banks’ Annual Reports
Gordon R. Mitchell – Ehninger’s Argument Violin
Dima Mohammed – Towards A Pragma-Dialectical Approach To Negotiation
Jeremy Morris – Pragmatic Reflexivity In Self-defeating And Self-justifying Expressions
Daniel J. O’Keefe – Normatively Responsible Advocacy: Some Provocations From Persuasion Effects Research
Hiroko Okuda – Prime Minister Mori’s Controversial “Divine Nation” Remarks: A Case Study Of Japanese Political Communication Strategies
Edward Panetta – Obscuring The Facts: The Bush Administration And The Politicization Of Science In The Greenhouse Debate
Georgios Papagounos & Manolis Polychronides – On Relevance
Donn W. Parson & George Ziegelmueller – Rhetorical Irony: Problems And Possibilities
Marijan Pavčnik – The Rule Of Law Argument (Its Elements And Some Open Questions And Cases)
Roosmaryn Pilgram & Leah E. Polcar – Questioning The Fallacy Of Many Questions
H. José Plug – Evaluating Attacks On The Credibility Of Politicians In Political Debates
Leah E. Polcar – Question-Reply Argumentation Reconsidered: A Pragma-Dialectical Account Of How Questions And Answers Are Used In Critical Discussion
Marian Pijnenburg – Quote … Unquote. Direct Quotation As A Strategic Manoeuvre In The Confrontation Stage
Karen Rasmussen – Warranting Spiritual Reclamation In Chicana Literature
Angela G. Ray – Arguments For Popular Audiences: Early U.S. Woman’s Rights Advocacy In The Lyceum Lectures Of Elizabeth Oakes Smith
M.A. van Rees – Dissociation: Between Rhetorical Success And Dialectical Soundness
Anna Carolina Regner – The Polemical Interaction Between Darwin And Mivart: A Lesson On Refuting Objections
Martin Reisigl – The Dynamics Of Right-Wing Populist Argumentation In Austria
Pedro Reygadas & Josefina Guzman – Visual Schematization: Advertising And Gender In Mexico
John Rief – Talking At Cross Purposes: Violating Higher-Order Conditions With Oppositional Arguments
Patricia Riley, Thomas Hollihan & James F. Klumpp – On Taking The UN Seriously As A Site For Public Arguments: Does The UN Have A Role In The 21st Century?
Juho Ritola – On Justified Belief In The Link Of An Argument
Robert C. Rowland – Purpose, Argument Fields, And Theoretical Justification
Lambèr Royakkers & Bart van Klink – Equality In Utilitarian Reasoning Or: How Useful Is The Pragma-Dialectical Approach As An Analytical And Critical Tool?
Sara Rubinelli, Peter J. Schulz & Kent Nakamoto – Reading Direct-To-Consumer Advertising Of Prescription Medicine. A Qualitative Study From Argumentation Theory On Its Dialectical And Rhetorical Features
Mirela Saim – Reforming The Jews, Rejecting Marginalization: The 1799 German Debate On Jewish Emancipation In Its Controversy Context
Margareth Sandvik – The Rhetoric Of Emotions In Political Argumentation
Janice Schuetz – A Typology Of Arguments In U.S. Judicial Opinions About Immigration
Susan A. Sci – Aesthetic Reason: Expanding The Role Of Argumentation & Deliberation Within Aesthetic Theory
Marita Seppänen – The Quality Of Argumentation In Masters Theses
Michael J. Shaffer – The Ad Verecundiam Fallacy And Appeals To Expert Testimony
M. Siderits – Contradiction In Madhyamaka Buddhist Argumentation
Harvey Siegel & John Biro – Rationality, Reasonableness, And Critical Rationalism: Problems With The Pragma-Dialectical View
Anders Sigrell – The Normativity Of The Progymnasmata Exercises
Virgílio Afonso da Silva – Legal Argumentation, Constitutional Interpretation, And Presumption Of Constitutionality
Alla V. Smirnova -Why Do Journalists Quote Other People, Or On The Functions Of Reported Speech In Argumentative Newspaper Discourse
A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans – Manoeuvring Strategically With Rhetorical Questions
Tim Steffensmeier – Arguments Across Symbolic Forms: An Analysis Of Presidential Popularity
Kevin A. Stein, Suzanne Larson & Lionel A. Grady – Antapologia Arguments During The Hurricane Katrina Disaster
Takeshi Suzuki – A Fantasy Theme Analysis Of Prime Minister Koizumi’s “Structural Reform Without Sacred Cows”
Konishi Takuzo – Conceptualizing And Evaluating Dissociation From An Informal Logical Perspective
Christopher W. Tindale – Textual Allusion As Rhetorical Argumentation: Gorgias, Plato And Isocrates
Karen Tracy – How Newspaper Coverage Transforms Policy Issues Into Character Matters: Debate About A School District’s Test Scores
Tatyana P. Tretyakova – Polyphony Of Interpretations In Providing Argumentation In Modern Media Text
Assimakis Tseronis – The Management Of The Burden Of Proof And Its Implications For The Analysis Of Qualified Standpoints: The Case Of Evaluative Adverbials
Leire Urbieta & Begoña Carrascal – Circular Arguments Analysis
Hilde Van Belle – When You Don’t Have Anything To Prove. Strategic Manoeuvering And Rhetorical Argumentation
Jeffrey VanCleave – The Role Of Argument In Political Advocacy And The Power Of The Enthymeme: A Case Study Of The NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program Debate
Luis Vega & Paula Olmos – Enthymemes: The Starting Of A New Life
Ana María Vicuña Navarro – An Ideal
Ron Von Burg – Cinematic Arguments: The Efficacy Of The Day After Tomorrow In Public Arguments On Global Warming
Kristine Warrenburg – Aesthetic Argument: Moving Beyond Logic
Jack Russell Weinstein – Adam Smith’s Ad Hominem: Eighteenth Century Insight Regarding The Role Of Character In Argument
Andreas Welzel & Christopher Tindale – Fallacies As Violations Of Rationality Norms. An Interdisciplinary Approach
David Cratis Williams & Marilyn J. Young – Argumentation And Education: Preparing Citizens In Cultures Of Democratic Communication
Carol Winkler – Encroachments On State Sovereignty: The Argumentation Strategies Of The George W. Bush Administration
Harald Wohlrapp – Who Is Afraid Of Emotion In Argument?
Minghui Xiong & Yi Zhao – A Defeasible Pragma-Dialectical Model Of Argumentation
Yadvigha Yaskevich – Moral And Legal Arguments In Modern Bioethics
David Zarefsky – The U.S. And The World: The Unexpressed Premises Of American Exceptionalism
Gábor Á. Zemplén – Utilising Pragma-Dialectics For The Study Of Scientific Controversies: The Published Part Of The Newton-Lucas Correspondence, A Case Study From The 1670s

image_pdfimage_print
Bookmark and Share

You May Also Like

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ The Criminal Abduction Paradox

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ The Criminal Abduction Paradox
ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ A Discussion Of Habermas’ Reading And Use Of Toulmin’s Model Of Argumentation

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ A Discussion Of Habermas’ Reading And Use Of Toulmin’s Model Of Argumentation
ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ The Rules Of The Critical Discussion And The Development Of Critical Thinking

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ The Rules Of The Critical Discussion And The Development Of Critical Thinking
ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ An Analysis Of Preschool Hebrew Speaking Children’s Arguments From The Perspective Of The Pragma-Dialectical Model

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ An Analysis Of Preschool Hebrew Speaking Children’s Arguments From The Perspective Of The Pragma-Dialectical Model
ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ Putin’s Terrorism Discourse As Part of Democracy And Governance Debate In Russia

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ Putin’s Terrorism Discourse As Part of Democracy And Governance Debate In Russia
ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ Cultural Differences In The Persuasiveness Of Normatively Strong And Normatively Weak Expert Evidence

ISSA Proceedings 2006 ~ Cultural Differences In The Persuasiveness Of Normatively Strong And Normatively Weak Expert Evidence
Category: ISSA

Comments

Leave a Reply





What is 10 + 13 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

  • About

    Rozenberg Quarterly aims to be a platform for academics, scientists, journalists, authors and artists, in order to offer background information and scholarly reflections that contribute to mutual understanding and dialogue in a seemingly divided world. By offering this platform, the Quarterly wants to be part of the public debate because we believe mutual understanding and the acceptance of diversity are vital conditions for universal progress. Read more...

  • Support

    Rozenberg Quarterly does not receive subsidies or grants of any kind, which is why your financial support in maintaining, expanding and keeping the site running is always welcome. You may donate any amount you wish and all donations go toward maintaining and expanding this website.

    10 euro donation:

    20 euro donation:

    Or donate any amount you like:

    Or:
    ABN AMRO Bank
    Rozenberg Publishers
    IBAN NL65 ABNA 0566 4783 23
    BIC ABNANL2A
    reference: Rozenberg Quarterly

    If you have any questions or would like more information, please see our About page or contact us: info@rozenbergquarterly.com

  • Follow us on Facebook & X & BlueSky

  • Archives