ISSA Proceedings 1998 – Table Of Contents

No comments yet

ISSA Proceedings 1998 

Frans H. van Eemeren et al – Preface
Aakhus, M. – Reconstruction games: Assessing the resources for managing collective argumentation in groupware technology
Aldrich, A.W. – Framing Blame and Managing Accountability to Pragma-Dialectical Principles in Congressional Testimony
Amossy, R. – The argument ad hominem in an interactional perspective
Azar, M. – Refuting counter-arguments in written essays
Baaske, K. – Arguing Over Values: The Affirmative Action Debate and Public Ethics
Baker, M. – The function of argumentation dialogue in cooperative problem-solving
Balter, S.J. – ‘The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas v Johnson’
Bedau, H.A. – What are the ‘Anarchical Fallacies’ Jeremy Bentham Discovered in the 1789 French: Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen?
Beer, F.A. & De Landtsheer, C. – Metaphorical politics: mobilization or tranquilization?
Berkenbosch, R. & Van der Geest, I. – Practical guidelines for justifying decisions about major projects
Birrer, F.A.J. – Asymmetry in the dialogue between expert and non-expert
Blair, J.A. – Walton’s argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning: A critique and development
Brandon, E.P. – What’s Wrong with God?
Branham, R. – Abolitionist reconstructions of July Fourth
Brashers, D.E., Haas, S.M. & Neidig, J.L. – Satisfying the Argumentative Requirements for Self Advocacy
Cattani, A. – Bad Reasoning, Good Humor
Chan, W. – Wittgenstein and Cognitive Psychology
Cohen, D.H. – How To Lose an Argument
Coleman, E. – Acts of argumentation: beyond spoken dialog
Collins, C.A. & Schmid, J.D. – The Power and Perceived Truthfulness of Visual Arguments in U.S. Political Campaign Biofilms
Conley, T.M. – The Renaissance Roots of Perelman’s Rhetoric
Craig, R.T. & Sanusi, A.L. – “I’m Just Saying …”: Discourse Markers of Standpoint Continuity
Danblon, E. – Is Praise a kind of Advice?
Darsey, J. – Calculating Environmental Value: The Displacement Of Moral Argument
DeLoach, M.B. & Engstrom DeLoach, D. – Argumentation and children’s art: An Examination of Children’s Responses to Art at The Dallas Museum of Art
Deppermann, A. – Semantic shifts in argumentative processes: A step beyond the ‘fallacy of equivocation’
Dietrich, J. – Argument Theory and the Rhetorical Practices of the North American ‘Central America Movement’
Dolder, F. – Methods for evaluating legal argumentation
Dolinina, I.B. – Does the hedgehog climb trees?: The neurological basis for ‘theoretical’ and ‘empirical’ reasoning patterns
Domajnko, B. – Towards a proposition of the argumentative square
Douglass, D. – The Use of Metaphor in Scientific Argument: The Case of Edward Clarke’s Sex in Education
Doury, M. – Burden of proof : a negociable argumentative ‘chore’
Eemeren, F.H. van & Houtlosser, P. – Delivering the goods in critical discussion
Eemeren, F.H. van & Houtlosser, P. – William the Silent’s Argumentative Discourse
Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., Meuffels, B. & Verburg, M. – The (un)reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies
Farrell, K.M. – Ubuntu or Acknowledgment: An Analysis of the Argument Practices of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Farrell, Th.B. – Magnitude Beyond Measure: Judgment and Justice in the late Twentieth Century
Feteris, E. – What went wrong in the ball-point case? An analysis and evaluation of the discussion in the ball-point case from the perspective of a rational discussion
Finocchiaro, M.A. – A critique of the dialectical approach: part II
Fiordo, R. – Truth and Justice In Mass Media Reporting and Commentary: Serving More Than One Master In American Adversarial Contexts
Fopma, M. – Standpoints in literary reviews
Freeman, J.B. – Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective
Fulmer, C.L. – Critical Thinking: Assessment, Flow Charts and Computers
Fusfield, W.D. – “Scorching Irony, Not Convincing Argument, is Needed”: Frederick Douglass on Some Rhetorical Limitations of Argumentation
Gabbay, D.M. & Woods, J. – Ad Baculum is not a Fallacy!
Garssen, B. – The nature of symptomatic argumentation
Gerritsen, S. – The history of the enthymeme
Gilbert, M.A. – Language, words and expressive speech acts
Girle, R.A. – Dialethic dialogue
Goloubev, V. – Looking at Argumentation through Communicative Intentions: Ways to Define Fallacies
Gonda, J. – How Rhetoric Became A Science
Goodnight, G.Th. & Hingstman, D.B. – Root metaphors and critical inquiry into social controversies: Redeeming Stephen Pepper in and for the study of argument
Goodwin, J. – Good argumentation without resolution
Govier, T. – Argument, Adversariality, and Controversy
Graham, K. – Normative argumentation in a pluralist world
Gratton, C. – Viciousness and Actual Infinity in Aristotle’s Infinite Regress Arguments
Grennan, W. – The Role Of Arguer Credibility In Argument Evaluation
Groarke, L. – The Pragma-Dialectics of Visual Argument
Gronbeck, B.E. – A General Theory of Public Argumentation: Death and Re-birth?
Grootendorst, R. – Innocence by dissociation. A pragma-dialectical analysis of the fallacy of incorrect dissociation in the Vatican document ‘We remember: A reflection on the Shoah’
Haaften, T. van – Definitions in legal discussions
Hage, J. – Constitutive rules and rules of inference
Hample, D. – Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of the Inquisition
Hample, D. & Benoit, P.J. – Must Arguments be Explicit and Violent? A Study of Naïve Social Actors’ Understandings
Hansen, H.V. – Argumental deduction: A programme for informal logic
Hazen, M.D. & Lenzmeier, S. – Methods for Arguer Reconstruction of Arguments
Heberle, V.M. – Two kinds of argument in editorials of women’s magazines
Heeney, T. – Visualizing Recognition
Herbeck, D.A. – ‘Three Strikes’ and ‘Hail Mary’ Passes: Sports Metaphors in Public Argument
Hicks, D. – Public Reason and the Political Character of Reasonableness
Hitchcock, D. – Probabilification
Hoaglund, J. – Informal Logic: The Two Schools
Hoeken, H. – The perceived and actual persuasiveness of different types of inductive arguments
Hohmann, H. – Legal rhetoric and dialectic in the renaissance: Topica Legalia and Status Legales
Hollihan, Th.A., Klumpp, J.F. and Riley, P. – Public Argument in the Post-Mass Media Age
Hoppin, S. – The Changing Ethos of Physicians and Implications for Their Ability to Persuade
Horn, R.E. – Using Argumentation Analysis to Examine History and Status of a Major Debate in Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy
Horwitz, L.D. – ‘Blocking the Enthymeme’ Does it Unblock Identity Problems in Argumentation
Ilie, C. and Hellspong, L. – Arguing from Clichés: Communication and Miscommunication
Jackson, S. – The Importance of Being Argumentative: Designing Disagreement into Teaching/Learning Dialogues
Jacobs, S. – Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics
Janas, M.J. – 30,000 Feet Over the Smithsonian: Authenticity and Vicarious Collective Memory
Johnson, R.H. – The problem of truth for theories of argument
Jones, C. – Democratic Justice, Argumentative Dialogue, and Political Legitimacy
Jørgensen, C. and Kock, C. – The rhetorical audience in public debate and the strategies of vote-gathering and vote-shifting
Kane, Th. – Public Argument and Civil Society: The Cold War Legacy as a Barrier to Deliberative Politics
Kaptein, H.- Abductive Limits to Artificial Intelligence in Adjudication Pervasive problems of analogy, e contrario and circumstantial evidence
Kasle, S. – Promoting Interscholastic Debate Among Tallahassee Secondary Schools
Kauffeld, F.J. – The Good Case for Practical Propositions: Limits of the Arguer’s Obligation to Respond to Objections
Kienpointner, M. – Figures of Speech: Definition, Description and Critical Evaluation
Kjeldsen, J.E. – Visual Rhetoric – From Elocutio To Inventio
Kloosterhuis, H. – Final but not infallible. Two dimensions of judicial decisions
Krabbe, E.C.W. – The Dialectic of Quasi-Logical Arguments
Kruse, J. – Fantasy themes and rhetorical visions in the ‘BRENT SPAR’ crisis: an analysis of articles appearing in German and French newspapers
Laar, J.A. van – The use of ambiguous expressions in discussions
Lakatos, L. – Giving Reasons in Intricate Cases: An Empirical Study in the Sociology of Argumentation
Langsdorf, L. – The Tacit Dimension in Argumentation
Lapintie, K. – The Concept of Resolving Differences of Opinion and its Practical Implications in Planning Theory
Latonero, M. – Shifting legitimation strategies in the public sphere: The case of the National Endowment for the Arts
Leff, M. – Rhetorical Prolepsis and the Dialectical Tier of Argumentation
Levi, D.S. – Teaching Logic: How to Overcome the Limitations of the Classroom
Liu, Y. – From Arguing within to Arguing across Boundaries: Globalization as a Challenge to Argumentation Studies
Lodder, A.R. – Dialogical argumentation: statement-based, argument-based and mixed models
López, C. – The Argumentative Analysis Of Literary Works And Its Importance In Teaching Argumentation
Lueken, G.-L. – How (not) to argue with ‘fundamentalists’. On the problem of arguing without a shared basis
Lumer, C. – Reductionism in Fallacy Theory
Maier, R. – Argumentation and public debate
Makau, J.M. – The Case for Cooperative Argumentation
Marttunen, M. and Laurinen, L. – Learning Of Argumentation In Face-To-Face And E-Mail Environments
Mendelson, M. – Quintilian and the Pedagogy of Argument
Mendenhall, V. – Pretending and Port-Royal Logic (Bad Reasoning and Pretend Reasoning)
Mengel, P. – The Concept Of Argumentation In Peter Singer’s ‘Practical Ethics’
Meurer, J.L. – You Think, I Know: Argumentation in Self-help Counseling
Miller, G.R. and Bunch, D. – Science and Rationalism in Warranting Assent: Examination of Congressional Environmental Arguments
Miller, M.K. – Denying the Argument of Indifference: Reclaiming the Possi- bility of Intimacy in Discourse
Mischo, Ch., Flender, J., Christmann, U. and Groeben, N. – Argumentational integrity: a training program for dealing with unfair argumentational contributions
Nardone, H. and Bassham, G. – Emotional Appeals in the Film ‘12 Angry Men’
Nemo, F. – Making a difference or not: utterances and argumentation
Newman, R.P. – The Most Powerful Engine of Cold War Argument: The Munich Analogy
Norman, A.P. – The Normative Structure of Adjudicative Dialogue
Nyan, T. – Simplement, as a metalinguistic operator
O’Keefe, D.J. – Argumentation Explicitness and Persuasive Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Citing Information Sources in Persuasive Messages
Oling, E. – The Cake or the Bakery? The conceptual structure of debates between ‘revolutionaries’ and ‘reformists’
Oostdam, R. and Glopper, K. de – Students’ Skill In Judging Argument Validity
Palczewski, C.H. – Neutrality as Advocacy: The Argumentative Dynamics in a State-sponsored, ‘Neutral’, Educational Abortion Video
Plantin, C. – Arguing emotions
Plug, J. – Evaluating tests for reconstructing the structure of legal argumentation
Plumer, G. – Phenomenological Argumentative Structure
Polcar, L. and Jacobs, S. – Evasion in Question-Answer Argumentation: An Empirical Extension
Powers, L.H. – Dividing by Zero – and other mathematical fallacies
Putnam, C.E. – Arguing About Dying
Quignard, M. and Baker, M. – Conditions for Spontaneous Production of Computer-Mediated Argumentative Dialogues between Learners
Radev, S. – Judges in Argumentation Games
Raukas, M. – Arguments from Perfections
Raymond, G.A. – Duties Beyond Borders? Appeals To Moral Necessity In Statecraft
Reed, C. – Is it a Monologue, a Dialogue or a turn in a Dialogue?
Reed, C. and Daskalopulu, A. – Modelling Contractual Arguments
Rees, M.A. van – The diagnostic power of the stages of critical discussion in the analysis and evaluation of problemsolving discussions
Reygadas, P. – Legitimacy And Seduction Of War: the Declaración de la Selva Lacandona, Chiapas 1994
Ritola, J. – Wilson on Circular Arguments
Rühl, M. – Emergent vs. Dogmatic Argumentation; towards a theory of the argumentative process
Sandvik, M. – Criteria for winning and losing a political debate
Santos, C.M.M. – Evaluating ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’: More or Less Polarised Opinions?
Schutte, P.J. – The strategies and tactics used by F.W. de Klerk and Nelson Mandela in the televised debate before South Africa’s first democratic election
Schwed, M.- What makes the Reductio ad Absurdum an important tool for rationality?
Sillince, J.A.A. – The Institutionalisation Of Argumentation Within Organisational Settings
Simons, H.W. – Problematizing Standards Of Argumentation To Students
Slade, C. – Reasons to buy: Teaching reasoning through television
Slob, W.H. – What makes an argument a good one? Reasonableness rather than rationality
Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. – Argument or explanation? Propositional relations as clues for distinguishing arguments from explanations
Spranz-Fogasy, Th. – Interactional Resources of Argumentation
Starmans, R. – Validity of distributed inference; towards a formal specification of validity criteria in argumentative models
Strikwerda, R.A. – Falsification and Fieldwork in Recent American Anthropology: Argument Before and After the Mead/Freeman Controversy
Suzuki, T. – Rhetoric as ideological pronouncement: An analysis of the cardinal principles of the national entity of Japan
Tarnay, L. – On the Fallacy of Fallacy: Arguing for methodological difference: producing vs processing
Tchouechov, V. – Totalitarian argumentation: theory and practice
Tindale, C.W. – Arguing for Bakhtin
Torck, D. – Partial quotes in headlines and subheads in Le Monde. An exploration in polyphonic journalistic writing and opinion forming
Tracy, K. – The Usefulness of Platitudes in Arguments about Conduct
Tretyakova, T.P. – Sustainable development: new paradigms in discourse linguistics
Uijttewaal, T. – Quotations as arguments in literary reviews
Vassiliev, L.G. – Rational Comprehension of Argumentative Texts
Vedder, I. – Linguistic and pragma-rhetorical characteristics of argumentative discourse in L2 and L1
Verheij, B. – Argument mediation for lawyers: the presentation of arguments
Vermaak, M. – On Conversational Constraint
Vicuña, A.M. – The Improvement Of Teacher Training In Philosophy For Children Through The Pragma Dialectic Approach
Vilanova Arias, J. – Conditional Reasoning
Volquardsen, B. – Do Advertisers Argue in their Campains?
Voss, J.F. – The Narrative as an Argument Component
Vuijk, W. – Cultural reflections in argumentation: an analysis of survey interviews
Walton, D. – The Identity Crisis of Informal Logic
Wander, Ph.C. and Lorimer, M. – The Guggenheim: A Rhetorical Turn in Architecture
Weger Jr., H. – The effects of dialectical fallacies in interpersonal and small group discussions: Empirical evidence for the pragma-dialectical approach
Weinstein, M. – Truth and Argument
Williams, D.C. – Encompassing And Enacting Dialectic: Kenneth Burke’s Theory Of Dramatism
Wolski, S.L. and Jacobs, S. – Presumptive Reasoning and the Pragmatics of Assent: The Case of Argument Ad Ignorantiam
Woods, J. – Slippery Slopes. Slope: The reciprocal of a node on a curve or surface
Wreen, M.J. – A Few Remarks on the Individuation of Arguments
Wright, M.H. – Greek Mythic Conceptions of Persuasion
Yano, Y. – The Irony of ‘Debate’: A Sociological Analysis on the Introduction of ‘Debate’ Education in Japan
Yaskevitch, Y. – On The Role Of Ethical And Axiological Arguments In The Modern Science
Young, M.J. and Launer, M.K. – The Final Days: The Development of Argumentative Discourse in the Soviet Union
Zagar, I.Z. – From Topos To Locus To Topos: Between Aristotle And Ducrot
Ziegelmueller, G. and Parson, D.W. Linguistically Sound Arguments

image_pdfimage_print
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Leave a Reply





What is 14 + 4 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)
  • About

    Rozenberg Quarterly aims to be a platform for academics, scientists, journalists, authors and artists, in order to offer background information and scholarly reflections that contribute to mutual understanding and dialogue in a seemingly divided world. By offering this platform, the Quarterly wants to be part of the public debate because we believe mutual understanding and the acceptance of diversity are vital conditions for universal progress. Read more...
  • Support

    Rozenberg Quarterly does not receive subsidies or grants of any kind, which is why your financial support in maintaining, expanding and keeping the site running is always welcome. You may donate any amount you wish and all donations go toward maintaining and expanding this website.

    10 euro donation:

    20 euro donation:

    Or donate any amount you like:

    Or:
    ABN AMRO Bank
    Rozenberg Publishers
    IBAN NL65 ABNA 0566 4783 23
    BIC ABNANL2A
    reference: Rozenberg Quarterly

    If you have any questions or would like more information, please see our About page or contact us: info@rozenbergquarterly.com
  • Like us on Facebook

  • Follow us on Twitter

  • Recent Articles

  • Rozenberg Quarterly Categories

  • Rozenberg Quarterly Archives