ISSA Proceedings 2002 – Table of Contents

No comments yet

Table of Contents ISSA Proceedings 2002 – work in progress

Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard (eds.) – Preface
Alan W. Aldrich – Considering Culture In The Analysis Of Arguments
R. P. Alford – Leff’s Account Of The Aristotelian Roots Of The Boethian Theory Of Dialectical Reasoning: A Contemporary Reconsideration
Ruth Amossy – The Argumentative Dimension Of Discourse
Richard Andrews – Argumentation In Education: Issues Arising From Undergraduate Students’ Work
Constantin Antonopoulos – On The Use And Misuse Of Analyticity In Arguments
Satoru Aonuma – The Constitution, Critical Rhetoric, And Public Argument: The Case Of Democratic Japan
Peter D. Asquith – Cases – Their Role In Informal Logic
Albert Atkin & John E. Richardson – Constructing The (Imagined) Antagonist In Advertising Argumentation
Txetxu Ausín & Lorenzo Peña – Arguing From Facts To Duties (And Conversely)
Kevin T. Baaske & Patricia Riley – In Defense Of The Realm: Administrative Responses To Anti-Globalization Argumentation
Michael Baker, Matthieu Quignard, Kristine Lund – UMR 5612 GRIC, Groupe de Recherches sur les Interactions Communicatives, Équipe Interaction & Cognition, C.N.R.S. & Université Lumière Lyon 2 & Marije van Amelsvoort – Department of Educational Sciences, Utrecht University – Designing – A Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Situation For Broadening And Deepening Understanding Of The Space Of Debate
Susan Balter-Reitz – She Blinded Me With Science: Material Argument In The Indianapolis Children’s Museum
Gregory Bassham  – Linked And Independent Premises: A New Analysis
Shawn Batt – The National Education Reform Debate And The Rhetoric Of The Contrarians
Sandra Bégoin-Augereau & Josiane Caron-Pargue  – Linguistic Criteria For Demarcation And Hierarchical Organization Of Episodes In A Problem Solving Task
Hilde van Belle – Two Ways Of Analysing A ‘Light Mix’ Newspaper Article
Keith Berry –  Cut-Ups, Slams And Jabs: Verbal Aggressiveness Or Politeness?
Stefano Bertea – Legal Argumentation Theory And The Concept Of Law
Barbara A. Biesecker – Technologies Of Truth And National Trauma:  Revisiting The Enola Gay Controversy
Frans A.J. Birrer – Expert Advice And Discourse Coupling: Context-Dependent Valdation Of Model-Based Reasoning
V. William Balthrop & Carole Blair – – Discursive Collisions: A Reading Of  “Ellen’s Energy Adventure”
J. Anthony Blair – The Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic And Rhetoric
George Boger – Formal Logic’s Contribution To The Study Of Fallacies
Lilit Brutian – On The Pragmatics Of Argumentative Discourse
Andrew J. Burgess – Religious Argument As Enthymeme: Aristotle, Paul, And Anselm
Ann E. Burnette & Wayne L. Kraemer – Making The Case For War: Bush’s Rhetorical Validation Of America’s Action

Read more

Jesús Cala Carrillo & Manuel L. de la Mata Benítez – School Experience, Modes Of Discourse And Argumentation: A Comparative Study Of Women And Men
Ines Calvo De Miguel – Some Remarks On Wittgenstein’s Ideas About Ethics
Jean Caron & Josiane Caron-Pargue – A multidimensional analysis of French modal verbs pouvoir, devoir and falloir
Adelino Cattani – Co-operational and conflictual models of discussion
Annalisa Cattani – Argumentative mechanisms in advertising
David S. Chimovitz – The play of presumption: A Derridian examination of Whately’s concept of presumption
Evi Chryssafidou & Mike Sharples – Computer-supported planning of essay argument structure
Jeanne E. Clark – William Wilberforce and the abortion controversy
Daniel H. Cohen – Logical Fallacies, Dialectical Transgressions, Rhetorical Sins, And Other Failures Of Rationality In Argumentation1
Catherine Ann Collins – World Environment Day 2000: Arguing for environmental action
Robert T. Craig & Karen Tracy – ‘The issue’ in argumentation practice and theory
David Cram Helwich – Menace or deterrent? The post-Cold War debate concerning American nuclear alert status
Peter Cramer – Public sphere: The problem of access and the problem of quality
Kevin Cummings – Spectacle and trauma: An analysis of the media coverage of the Oklahoma City Bombing
Emmanuelle Danblon – Perelman’s universal audience: Between norms and facts
Joseph Dichy – Kinâya, a tropic device from medieval Arabic rhetoric, and its impact on discourse theory
Antoni Diller – Retransmittability and empirical propositions
Dinev, Valeri – God. Man, Universe
Inga B. Dolinina – Communicative components of imperatives as speech acts
Marianne Doury –  The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation

E. F. Dyck – Topos in rhetorical argumentation: From enthymeme to figure
Renske van Dijk, Lettica Hustinx & Hans Hoeken – A normative and empirical approach to Petty and Cacioppo’s ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ arguments
Libby Eddleman Spears & Millie Crews – Mobile argument: An investigation of bumper stickers in the United States
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels – The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical freedom rule
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels – I don’t have anything to prove here. The (un)reasonableness of evading the burden of proof
Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser – A pragmatic view of the burden of proof
Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser – Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering: The argumentum ad verecundiam, a case in point
Danielle Endres – Responding to multiculturalism in the real world: Re-envisioning argumentation pedagogy to include culturally diverse methods of argumentation
Tom Farrell & Mark Lawrence McPhail – Reparations or separation? The rhetoric of racism in black and white
Eveline T. Feteris – The rational reconstruction of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context: The analysis and evaluation of teleological argumentation
Cara A. Finnegan – Image vernaculars: Photography, anxiety and public argument
Walter R. Fisher – Reconfiguring Practical Wisdom
David Frank & Michelle Bolduc – Beyond amnesia and critical thinking: Forensics and argument pedagogy
James B. Freeman – The pragmatic dimension of premise acceptability
Richard Friemann – Intractable quarrels
C. Lynne Fulmer – The Puzzle Method of Teaching Arguments (pmta)
Gilbert Fulmer – The genealogy of argumentation
Jonas Gabrielsen – Is there a topical dimension to the rhetorical example?
Eric M. Gander – Adapted arguments: Logic and rhetoric in the age of genes and hardwired brains
Josué García Amián, José A. Sánchez Medina & Beatriz Macías Gómez-Estern – Identity as action. Methodological implications for the study of cultural identity from a historical-cultural approach
Michael A. Gilbert – Let’s talk: Emotion and the pragma-dialectic model
David M. Godden – On Toulmin’s fields and Wittgenstein’s later views on logic
G.C. Goddu – Context and argument evaluation
Maureen Daly Goggin – Arguing in ‘Pen of Steele and Silken Inke’: Theorizing a broader material base for argumentation
Peter N. Goggin – When governments collide: The rhetoric of competing national arguments and public space
Vadim Goloubev – The 2000 American presidential tv debates: Dialogue or fight?
G. Thomas Goodnight – The wiles of argument: Protodeliberation and heroic prudence in Homer’s Odyssey
Jean Goodwin – Designing premises
Claude Gratton – The dialogical and logical structure of a strategy to block certain vicious infinite regresses
Leo Groarke – Are musical arguments possible?
Bruce E. Gronbeck – Coductive and abductive foundations for sentimental arguments in politics
Kati Hannken-Illjes – The ‘argument of continuity’
Hans Vilhelm Hansen – The rabbit in the hat: Where do dialectical rules come from?
Dale Hample – Inventional capacity
Joy L. Hart, Shirley C. Willihnganz & Charles A. Willard – Improvisation in organizations: Rhetorical logic and rhetorical skill
Gerard A. Hauser – Aesthetic arguments and civil society
Brooks F. Haynie & Jean E. Kubeck – Argumentative traits in older adults: An exploratory study
Dale Herbeck – The athleticization of the political process: Sports metaphors and public argument
Tim Heysse – Consensus and power. The facts of democracy
Darrin Hicks – Reasonableness before rationality: The case of unreasonable searches and seizures
Mika Hietanen – Paul’s argumentation in Galatians 3.6–14
David Hitchcock – Toulmin’s warrants
John Hoaglund – Using argument types
Hans Hoeken & Lettica Hustinx – The relative persuasiveness of anecdotal, statistical, causal and expert evidence
David C. Hoffman – Reversing perceptions of probability through self-referential argument: Interpretation and analysis of Protagoras’ stronger/weaker fragment
Hanns Hohmann – Rhetoric, dialectic, and political persuasion in the case of John the Fearless, Duke of Burgundy (1408)
Thomas A. Hollihan, Patricia Riley & James F. Klumpp – Fundamentalism versus cosmopolitanism: Argument, cultural identity, and political violence in the global age
Stephanie L. Hood – Arguing for a cause: President Bush and the comic frame
Um Hoon – How could official speakers communicate reasonably with their king?
Jos Hornikx, Marianne Starren & Hans Hoeken – Cultural influence on the relative occurrence of evidence types
Lettica Hustinx – Different types of evidence and quality of argumentation in racist pamphlets
Thomas J. Hynes Jr. – Risk, vulnerability, and American public argument after September 11
Sally Jackson & Dale Brashers – Assessing the problem validity of argumentation templates: Statistical rules of thumb
Scott Jacobs – Two conceptions of openness in argumentation theory
Henrike Jansen – E contrario reasoning and its legal consequences
Ralph H. Johnson – The dialectical tier revisited
Charlotte Jørgensen – The Mytilene debate: A paradigm for deliberative rhetoric
Taeda Jovicic – Evaluation of argumentative strategies
Sine Just – Rhetorical criticism of the debate on the future of the European Union. Strategic options and foundational understandings
Esam N. Khalil – Arguing between the lines: Grounding structure in advertising Discourse
Hendrik Kaptein – Tu quoque? Fallacy and vindication in appeal to other people’s ‘wrongs’
Takayuki Kato – Postmodern memorializing and peace rhetoric: Case study of ‘the Cornerstone of Peace,’ memorial of the battle of Okinawa
Fred J. Kauffeld – The ordinary practice of presuming and presumption with special attention to veracity and the burden of proof
Manfred Kienpointner – Perelman on causal arguments: The argument of waste
Loel Kim – Mapping visual narrative as argument in interactive media
Marietjie de Klerk – The effects of different socio-economic factors, language environments and attitudes of first year natural resources students on their performance in a critical thinking appraisal
Christian Kock – Gravity too is relative: On the logic of deliberative debate
László I. Komlósi – The conceptual fabric of argumentation and blended mental spaces
Takuzo Konishi – Dissociation and its relation to the theory of argument
Erik C. W. Krabbe – Metadialogues
Manfred Kraus – Charles S. Peirce’s theory of abduction and the Aristotelian enthymeme from signs
Tone Kvernbekk – On the argumentative quality of explanatory narratives
Jan Albert van Laar – The use of dialogue profiles for the study of ambiguity
Lenore Langsdorf – How narrative argumentation works: An analysis of argumentation aimed at reconsidering goals
Michael Leff – Rhetoric and dialectic in Martin Luther King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’
Yameng Liu – Beyond wartime propaganda: Argumentation and hostilities in the age of information and democracy
Vincenzo Lo Cascio – On the relationship between argumentation and narration: A linguistic model
Elenore Long – Community literacy: Negotiating difference in contemporary public spheres
Fredrick J. Long – ‘We destroy arguments…’ (2 Corinthians 10:5): The Apostle Paul’s use of epicheirematic argumentation
Celso López & Ana Maria Vicuña – The interaction between critical discussion principles and the development of a pluralistic society
Geert-Lueke Lueken – Giving and asking for reasons: The impact of inferentialism on argumentation theory
Christoph Lumer – Interpreting arguments
Robert Maier – Arguing in organizations: The struggle concerning rules and meaning
Roseann M. Mandziuk – Arguments on display: Conceptualizing the museum as a discursive text
Miika Marttunen, Leena Laurinen, Marta Hunya & Lia Litosseliti – Argumentation skills of secondary school students in Finland, Hungary and the United Kingdom
Anna A. Maslennikova & Tatyana P. Tretyakova – The rhetorical shift in interviews: New features in Russian political discourse
Raymie E. McKerrow & Jeffrey St. John – Legitimizing public discourse: Civility as gatekeeper
Jane McLeod & Hans V. Hansen – Argument density and argument diversity in the licence applications of French provincial printers, 1669 – 1781
Michael Mendelson – A prologue to the pedagogy of judgment
Byeong-Gon Min – Pragmatic functions of Korean proverbs as topoi in critical discussion
Gordon R. Mitchell – American Itsesensuuri: A typology of self-censorship in the ‘War on Terror’
Junya Morooka – Bourdieuian Criticism Of The Narrative Paradigm: The Case Of Historical Texts
Miguel Mori – Evaluation of secondary students’ written argumentations. Problems and proposal of an evaluation procedure
Peeter Müürsepp – The need for a new rationality
Monique Myers & Doug Smith – Differential argument construction: Examination of attorney and pro se arguments in the restraining Order Courtroom
Henry Nardone – Thinking critically about media violence: Does media violence contribute to real-world violence?
T. Nyan – Argumentation, categorization and divergent thinking
Daniel J. O’Keefe – Persuasive success and normatively-desirable argumentative conduct: Is it (persuasively) bad to be (normatively) good?
Kenneth Olson & Gilbert Plumer – Reasoning in listening
Fred Opali – The significance of effective communication in critical thinking
Donn W. Parson & George Ziegelmueller – Linguistically sound arguments: Part II: Eloquence and argument
May Relaño Pastor & Beatriz Macías Goméz-Stern – Argumentation and self-representation in everyday narratives: The logo activity
Luis A. Pérez-Miranda – Strength and order in practical reasoning: Decision-guiding argumentation
Robert C. Pinto – Reasons
Christian Plantin – The situation of argumentation studies in France: A new legitimacy
Emily Plec – Whitey’s Olympics: The discourse of discrimination in international sport
H.J. Plug – Evaluating unclarity in judicial decisions: Violations of the usage rule in legal argumentation
Susan Popham – Using an Activity System Model for analyzing effective arguments
Henry Prakken – Logical dialectics: The missing link between deductivism and pragma-dialectics
Theodore O. Prosise – Arguing National Missile Defense: Evaluating the Bush Administration’s ‘New Framework’ for Nuclear Security
Matthieu Quignard – A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions
Mart Raukas – The limits of intuitive argumentation: Thomas Aquinas on the communication between separated substances
Chris Reed & Douglas Walton – Diagramming, argumentation schemes and critical questions
M.A. van Rees  – Indicators of dissociation
Pedro Reygadas – A non-propositional approach to emotions in argument
J. Lynn Reynolds & Rodney A. Reynolds – Evidence in Interpersonal Influence
Eddo Rigotti & Andrea Rocci – From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again)
Andreea Deciu Ritivoi – Can testimonies constitute proof?
Juho Ritola – On reasonable question-begging arguments
Bertil Rolf & Charlotte Magnusson – Developing the art of argumentation. A software approach
Robert C. Rowland – Madison, Mill and the public sphere: A classically liberal approach to public deliberation
Timo Salminen, Miika Marttunen & Leena Laurinen – Grounding and counter-argumentation during face-to-face and synchronous network debates in secondary school
Clara Maria M. Santos, Magaly P. Mafaldo & Andrezza C. Marreiros – Dealing with alternative views: The case of the Big Bad Wolf and the Three Little Pigs
Janice Schuetz – Arguments of victims: A case study of the Timothy McVeigh trial
Menashe Schwed – ‘I see your point’ – On visual arguments
Zhang Shuxue – Argumentum ad hominem in a cross-cultural perspective
Harvey Siegel – Rationality and judgment
Anders Sigrell – Progymnasmata, pragmadialectics, and pedagogy
A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans – Indicators of analogy argumentation
Jan Sobocan – Critical thinking: Two views
Sorin Stati – Discourse correspondence between argumentative and grammatical sequences
S. C. Stumpf  & J.T. McDonnell – Is there an argument for this audience?
K.E. Supriya – Argument as empire formation: The letters of Elihu Yale
Takeshi Suzuki – Bakhtin’s theory of argumentative performance: Critical thinking education in Japan
Stefano Tardini – Keywords as passwords to communities
László Tarnay – The conceptual basis of visual argumentation. A case for arguing in and through moving images
V. Tchouechov – Argument to death and death as an argument: Logic, rhetoric, dialectics, and economics
Christopher W. Tindale – Hearing is believing: A perspective-dependent account of the fallacies
Anne Marie Todd – Empowering activism: Hortatory arguments in on-line environmental networks
Patricia Varas, Catherine Ann Collins & David Douglass – Metaphor and argument in Ernesto Che Guevara’s ‘Socialism and the New Man in Cuba’
Lev G. Vassiliev – A semio-argumentative perspective on enthymeme reconstruction
Bart Verheij – Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: Towards a methodology for the investigation of argumentation schemes
James F. Voss & Julie A. Van Dyke – Processing syllogisms and enthymemes in relation to their logical and pragmatic function
Ioanna Vovou – Discourse and emblematic figures of presenters in political debates on Greek television
Jean Wagemans – Conceptualizing fallacies: The informal logic and pragmadialectical approaches to the argumentum ad ignorantiam
Stephen J. Ward & Christopher Tindale – Rhetorical argumentation and the New Journalism: A case study
Harry Weger, Jr. & Mark Aakhus – A pragma-dialectical analysis of televised town hall meetings following the murder trial of O.J. Simpson: Competing demands and the structure of argumentation practices
Jack Russell Weinstein – Emotion, context and rhetoric: Adam Smith’s informal argumentation
Mark Weinstein – If at first you don’t succeed: Response to Johnson
Joseph W. Wenzel – Arguers’ obligations: Another perspective
David Cratis Williams & Catherine Palczewski – Vieques at the vortex: Identity arguments in crosscurrents of Puerto Rican and American nationalism
Carol Winkler – Perceived opposition as argument in formulating u.s. terrorism policy
Galia Yanoshevsky – Using one’s own words to argue in written interviews: Alain Robbe-Grillet and reported speech
Yadviha Yaskevich – Political risk and power in the modern world: Moral arguments and priorities
Igor Zagar – Argumentation’s black box?
David Zarefsky – Felicity conditions for the circumstantial ad hominem: The case of Bush v. Gore

Bookmark and Share


Leave a Reply

What is 7 + 11 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)
  • About

    Rozenberg Quarterly aims to be a platform for academics, scientists, journalists, authors and artists, in order to offer background information and scholarly reflections that contribute to mutual understanding and dialogue in a seemingly divided world. By offering this platform, the Quarterly wants to be part of the public debate because we believe mutual understanding and the acceptance of diversity are vital conditions for universal progress. Read more...
  • Support

    Rozenberg Quarterly does not receive subsidies or grants of any kind, which is why your financial support in maintaining, expanding and keeping the site running is always welcome. You may donate any amount you wish and all donations go toward maintaining and expanding this website.

    10 euro donation:

    20 euro donation:

    Or donate any amount you like:

    ABN AMRO Bank
    Rozenberg Publishers
    IBAN NL65 ABNA 0566 4783 23
    reference: Rozenberg Quarterly

    If you have any questions or would like more information, please see our About page or contact us:
  • Like us on Facebook

  • Archives